Caves are important for their geological history and the inhabiting fauna. The mining sector contributes to 5% of the Brazilian National Gross Income and employs over 1,170,000 people. Although highly desirable, at times these objectives are in conflict. The exploration of mineral reserves in Brazil is currently restricted by the existence of speleological formations generating serious impacts on the mining sector with economic and social implications. An equitable approach that enables the preservation of caves and its fauna and support a vigorous mining activity must be achieved. Remarkably, the mining sector has contributed to a revitalization of speleology and is responsible to the vast majority of new caves being described. Caves are characterized by geological and biospeleological criteria. Any void with over 5 meters of extension is included in the studies, notwithstanding of lithology. Those considered as of Maximum Relevance, must be protected. Caves of High Relevance may be removed if two other caves of High Relevance are permanently protected. Caves of Medium Relevance may also generate compensatory measures. Finally a buffer zone needs to be implemented around preserved caves. Most of the studies regard caves as of Maximum of High Relevance due to the large number of criteria used, given that the presence of one criterion is sufficient to declare a cave highly relevant. As an example in 2008 over 1,000 caves were explored and by 2013 only 30 were set for removal. In addition, identifying caves for compensation has proven extremely difficult.
The necessary studies to determine the level of relevance of caves are long (1-1.5 years), costly and especially limited in several aspects. One of the main limitations derives from the very high number of caves (over 7,000 caves are listed in the national database). The small number of specialist taxonomists is another limitation for the analysis of tens of thousands of specimens collected using classical taxonomy, especially in biological diversity rich regions. Lastly, the legislation is at times subjective and open to interpretation. This seminar aims to bring together industry partners, government agents and academics, to discuss possible solutions to these limitations and help design sustainable mining practices.Nos dias 18 e 19 de novembro, aconteceu, no Rio de Janeiro, o Seminário Internacional em Ecologia, Mineração e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. O evento foi organizado pela Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC), o Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração (IBRAM), a Sociedade Brasileira de Espeleologia (SBE) e a Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência (SBPC).
A sustentabilidade do uso dos recursos minerais e a preservação do patrimônio biológico nacional devem ser temas centrais nas atividades econômicas de qualquer país. A mineração é um setor importante no Brasil, tendo participação importante no PIB nacional. Também promove o desenvolvimento local através do impacto socioeconômico dos recursos advindos da exportação mineral.
O maior desafio do setor mineral no Brasil é compatibilizar as atividades extrativistas dos recursos com a preservação ambiental, processo que é regulado por um marco legal rigoroso e complexo. Um dos aspectos importantes desta questão é a conservação do patrimônio espeleológico do país.
No contexto da mineração de ferro, o foco de discussão atual foi a preservação das cavernas ferruginosas, que tem grande importância ecológica e vasta ocorrência em áreas ricas de minério de alta qualidade, o que dificulta a obtenção de licenças ambientais para operar. A politica de proteção às cavernas no Brasil impõe condicionantes ambientais que limitam empreendimentos em áreas de ocorrências espeleológicas relevantes, que são protegidas por leis especificas.
Há evidências de que a atual legislação de proteção das cavernas poderá comprometer parte da atividade econômica do setor mineral no Brasil. Para evitar a paralisação do setor, é urgente que se promova uma ampla discussão entre o conhecimento cientifico, representado pela academia; o marco regulatório, representado por organizações governamentais; e o setor de negócios, representado pelas empresas.
Buscou-se estabelecer uma posição de consenso entre as partes envolvidas e um posicionamento estratégico da questão, que possam subsidiar politicas publicas que permitam a atividade econômica concomitantemente à conservação dos recursos naturais e o desenvolvimento sustentável do Brasil.
November 18
9h – 9h30: Opening Ceremony
• João Fernando Gomes de Oliveira , Vice-President of the ABC
• Claudia M. d’Avila-Levy, General Secretary of the SBPC
• José Fernando Coura, President of the IBRAM
9h30 – 12h30: Keynote Presentations
Keynote 1: The Natural Resources and Development : The economic importance of mining in Brazil
• João Furtado (USP e Elabora Consultoria)
Keynote 2: Biodiversity and minding one’s own business
• Thomas Lewinsohn (UNICAMP)
Keynote 3: Impacts of Mining Operations: Assessment, scientific foundations, risks and grand challenges
• Luiz Enrique Sanchez (USP)
Keynote 4: Mining, Conservation and Development: A strategic view for business and for government
• José Fernando Coura (IBRAM)
14h – 18h
Panel 1: Mining and Biological Conservation
• Convener to be confirmed
Lecture 1: Mining and biological conservation in Australia
• Mark Harvey (Western Australia Museum)
Lecture 2: Offsetting the impact of mining to achieve no net loss of biodiversity
• Laura J. Sonter (University Queensland – Australia)
Lecture 3: Looking for synergy of mining and conservation: The case of Carajás mosaic
• speaker to be confirmed
Lecture 4 :Mining and Speleological Conservation : A view of the Brazilian Speleological Community
• Clayton Lino (RBMA)
Lecture 5: Has the private sector contributed to build knowledge and competence about the environment ?
• speaker to be confirmed
Discussion / Report
November 19
9h – 12h
Panel 2: Environmental Constraints to Mining Operations
• Convener – Rinaldo Mancin (IBRAM)
Lecture 1: Are caves a legal constraint to environmental licensing for mining in Brazil ?
• Jonatas Souza Trindade (IBAMA)
Lecture 2: Major gaps in the current legislation for caves conservation
• Ricardo Carneiro
Lecture 3: How other countries have dealt with legal constraints: The case of caves in Australia
• Bridget Hyder (EPA, Australia)
Lecture 4: Needed /Necessary adaptations of the Brazilian legislation for cave preservation
• Marcio Silva Pereira
Discussion / Report
13h30 – 16h30
Panel 3: A Science-Mediated Debate About Cave Preservation versus Mining Sustainability
• Convener – Rosa Lemos de Sá (FUNBIO)
Lecture 1: Caves and Mining: The dilemma of cave preservation within a mining context
• Augusto Auler (Carste – Ciência e Meio Ambiente)
Lecture 2: Ecological relevance of caves : Is it scientifically sound ?
• Maria Elina Bichuette (UFSCar)
Lecture 3: Ecology and taxonomy of troglobites: needs and challenges
• Antonio Domingos Brescovit (Instituto Butantã)
Lecture 4: Looking for a scientifically-based consensus view for cave preservation
• speaker to be confirmed
Discussion / Report
16h30: Concluding Section
Coordinated by IBRAM
• Brief Reports from each section by conveners
• General discussion concerning main issues of ecological constraints for mining industry
• Recommendations to industry, government and academia
Additional information :
Fernando Verissimo
Seminar’s executive secretary
verissimo(AT)abc.org.br
For accommodation, we recomend the Savoy Othon Hotel Copacabana
Vídeos